iPhone RAW photography
A few weeks ago I did some comparative analysis of the image quality from three cameras and wrote about it here. These results were interesting and have affected my way forward with photography. While I had a suitable subject set up, I thought that I would carry out another comparison with the camera that is just about always to hand: my iPhone …
What I was not trying to do was compare the iPhone with “real” cameras [though it would not do too badly in that comparison!]. What I was interested in was evaluating how I use the iPhone to take photos. Most iPhone photographers use the standard built-in app and this can produce great results. As mine is an iPhone 7 PLUS, which has two cameras, the app can perform some very clever tricks. However, the app can only capture JPEG [or HEIC] which is rather processed/compressed. I would rather shoot RAW.
As Apple used to say [and maybe still do], “there’s an app for that” and, indeed, there are a number of apps that capture RAW format images [DNG to be precise] and, thus, give the photographer more control and latitude. Over the last couple of years, I have tried a number of apps for this job – 4 in total, which is by no means exhaustive. The ones I tried were: ProCamera, Obscura, Halide and Lightroom Mobile. All of them produced what seemed to be acceptable results. In fact, I rather assumed that a RAW image was a RAW image and did not think about it too much. I concentrated on the operation and facilities of the apps and eventually settled on Lightroom Mobile as the synchronization with the desktop software was a breeze. I heard some rumors that different apps produced different results and this is what I set out to assess.
Once again, I took the same picture, using the same settings, with each app. As the aperture is fixed [I used the “wide angle” camera], the only variable was ISO, so I chose 200. Then I inspected the results, mainly being concerned with image detail/quality. Here are abstracts:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cdc5/4cdc53975bb37dffd59d33515b5d721d6c1fc8f4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/585dc/585dc0d9cd41e4beb1418431432bf6e9fee81964" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df010/df010708c4c91a88b9e245522ec19e627098b0ea" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b92c/7b92ce40ce5b2620aed8ba1359fd9e92b355389d" alt=""
The bottom line is that the images do vary. I have no understanding of why this is the case and will need to do some more research. My feeling is that Lightroom Mobile does worst and ProCamera may be best.